Health Belief Model and Contraceptive Choice Among High-Risk Women: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors

  • Hayunda Shasta Deasy Sarjana Terapan Kebidanan Poltekkes Kemenkes Malang
  • Nurul Pujiastuti Sarjana Terapan Kebidanan Poltekkes Kemenkes Malang
  • Sunaeni Sarjana Terapan Kebidanan Poltekkes Kemenkes Malang
  • Didien Ika Setyarini Sarjana Terapan Kebidanan Poltekkes Kemenkes Malang

Keywords:

health belief model, women of reproductive age, high-risk, contraception

Abstract

Inappropriate contraceptive choice among high-risk women of reproductive age (WRA) may increase the risk of unintended pregnancy and adverse maternal outcomes. Individual perceptions and beliefs regarding health risks and preventive actions, as described in the Health Belief Model (HBM), may influence contraceptive choice. However, evidence regarding the relationship between HBM components and contraceptive choice among high-risk WRA at the community level remains limited. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between Health Belief Model components and contraceptive choice among high-risk WRA in Mulyorejo Village, Sukun Subdistrict, Malang City. This study used a quantitative correlational design with a cross-sectional approach conducted from November 2024 to January 2025. A total of 64 respondents were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using the Spearman Rank correlation test with a significance level of 0.05. The results showed statistically significant relationships between all HBM components and contraceptive choice among high-risk WRA. Perceived susceptibility was associated with contraceptive choice (r = 0.301; p = 0.016), as were perceived severity (r = 0.349; p = 0.005), perceived benefits (r = 0.314; p = 0.011), perceived barriers (r = 0.313; p = 0.012), and cues to action (r = 0.307; p = 0.014). All correlations were categorized as low to moderate. The findings indicate that HBM components play an important role in influencing contraceptive choice among high-risk WRA. Strengthening women’s perceptions of pregnancy risk and improving counseling strategies may support appropriate contraceptive selection and improve reproductive health outcomes.

References

[1] L. Adiputri and L. M. Gutman, “Facilitators and barriers to contraception-use communication among Indonesian women,” Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 671–686, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13691058.2023.2238014. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2023.2238014

[2] A. A. Ayorinde, F. Boardman, M. McGranahan, et al., “Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: A behavioural analysis,” BMC Public Health, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12212-7. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12212-7

[3] J. Baek, K. H. Kim, and J. W. Choi, “Determinants of adherence to personal preventive behaviours based on the health belief model: A cross-sectional study in South Korea during the COVID-19 pandemic,” BMC Public Health, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13355-x. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13355-x

[4] S. Brito, M. M. Barros, and A. N. Lopes, “Factors associated with contraceptive choice and use among women of reproductive age: A systematic review,” Reproductive Health, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01654-2. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01654-2

[5] I. Intan Sari and Y. Zurizah, “Pengaruh pendidikan kesehatan terhadap pengetahuan ibu tentang metode suhu basal tubuh dan ovulasi billings,” Jurnal Kebidanan: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Budi Mulia, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2023, doi: 10.35325/kebidanan.v13i2.397. Available: https://doi.org/10.35325/kebidanan.v13i2.397

[6] S. Jahanfar, J. Mortazavi, A. Lapidow, et al., “Assessing the impact of contraceptive use on mental health among women of reproductive age: A systematic review,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06587-9. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06587-9

[7] M. Jain, R. Mozumdar, P. Tobey, et al., “Understanding drivers of family planning in rural northern India,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243854. Available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243854

[8] S. Kusemererwa, S. Kansiime, S. Nakamanya, et al., “Contraceptive use and pregnancy incidence among women in Uganda,” Reproductive Health, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01942-7. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01942-7

[9] H. E. Miller, S. L. Kruger, and D. M. Panelli, “Mental health conditions and contraception: Current landscape and clinical guidance,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 81–87, 2024, doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000936. Available: https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000936

[10] I. A. Murniati, N. P. W. Suriana, and A. Mawar, “Efek samping penggunaan kontrasepsi suntik: Reviu literatur,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ecosystem, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 278–288, 2024, doi: 10.35965/eco.v24i2.4672. Available: https://doi.org/10.35965/eco.v24i2.4672

[11] N. Nurjaeni, Y. Sawangdee, U. Pattaravanich, et al., “The role of structural and process quality of family planning care in modern contraceptive use in Indonesia: A multilevel analysis,” BMC Public Health, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11858-7. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11858-7

[12] R. I. Aryanty et al., “Contraceptive use and maternal mortality in Indonesia: A community-level ecological analysis,” Reproductive Health, vol. 18, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01022-6. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01022-6

[13] N. A. Putri and S. Ronoatmodjo, “Faktor penggunaan MKJP pada wanita usia 15–49 tahun di pedesaan Indonesia,” Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.14710/jkm.v11i5.38572. Available: https://doi.org/10.14710/jkm.v11i5.38572

[14] P. Redo, “Efektivitas metode kontrasepsi jangka panjang dalam mencegah kehamilan dini,” Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 95–106, 2021, doi: 10.54082/jupin.10. Available: https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.10

[15] L. Robinet, A. Jeffredo, and C. Clesse, “Factors influencing contraceptive choice during the postpartum period: A systematic review,” Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 265–286, 2023, doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13471. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13471

[16] J. A. Saputri, N. J. C. Safitri, H. A. Jaudah, and C. K. Herbawani, “Determinan yang memengaruhi penerimaan metode kontrasepsi vasektomi pada pria di Indonesia,” Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1469–1478, 2024, doi: 10.54082/jupin.533. Available: https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.533

[17] R. H. Setyorini and R. W. Utami, “Prediksi perilaku penggunaan kontrasepsi menggunakan health belief model,” Jurnal Kesehatan Komunitas, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 372–380, 2022, doi: 10.25311/keskom.vol8.iss2.1221. Available: https://doi.org/10.25311/keskom.vol8.iss2.1221

[18] S. Taflinger and S. Sattler, “A situational test of the health belief model: How perceived susceptibility mediates the effects of the environment on behavioral intentions,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 346, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116715. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116715

[19] S. Teal and A. Edelman, “Contraception selection, effectiveness, and adverse effects: A review,” JAMA, vol. 326, no. 24, pp. 2507–2518, 2021, doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.21392. Available: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.21392

[20] F. P. Utami, E. Gustina, D. Sulistiawan, et al., “Husband’s influence in the use of long-acting reversible contraception in Indonesia,” Bulletin of the National Research Centre, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s42269-022-00771-7. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-022-00771-7

[21] A. Zewdie, A. Mose, T. Sahle, et al., “The health belief model’s ability to predict COVID-19 preventive behavior: A systematic review,” SAGE Open Medicine, vol. 10, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.1177/20503121221113668. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121221113668

[22] World Health Organization, “Family planning/contraception methods,” Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception

[23] United Nations Population Fund, “State of world population 2024,” New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.unfpa.org/swp2024

[24] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Contraception and birth control methods,” Atlanta, GA, USA, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/contraception/

[25] Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, “Profil kesehatan Indonesia 2024,” Jakarta, Indonesia, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.kemkes.go.id

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

Issue

Section

Family Planning Program and Reproduction Health

Categories